%PDF-1.3
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>stream
q
q
612.00 0.00 0.00 790.80 0.00 0.00 cm
0.00 0.00 0.00 rg
/Im6 Do Q
Q q
BT
3 Tr
/F7 16.77 Tf
233.28 738.24 TD
(County of Los Angeles) Tj
/F7 17.76 Tf
-30.48 -20.40 TD
(CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE) Tj
/F7 7.91 Tf
50.88 -11.04 TD
(Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration) Tj
/F7 7.92 Tf
-54.72 -9.36 TD
(500 West Temple Street, Room 713, Los Angeles, California 90012) Tj
/F8 8.45 Tf
91.20 -11.04 TD
(\(213\) 974-1101) Tj
/F7 7.68 Tf
-12.24 -7.44 TD
(http://ceo.lacounty .gov) Tj
/F7 10.00 Tf
-236.16 -17.04 TD
(WILLIAM T FUJIOKA) Tj
/F8 8.70 Tf
7.20 -11.04 TD
(Chief Executive Offcer) Tj
/F7 7.33 Tf
422.40 8.40 TD
(Board of Supervisors) Tj
/F7 7.36 Tf
-.24 -9.84 TD
(GLORIA MOLINA) Tj
/F7 7.28 Tf
0.24 -7.20 TD
(First District) Tj
/F8 7.28 Tf
0.00 -14.88 TD
(MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS) Tj
/F7 7.35 Tf
-.24 -7.44 TD
(Second District) Tj
/F7 11.37 Tf
-395.76 -14.88 TD
(March 10,2010) Tj
/F7 6.98 Tf
395.52 0.24 TD
(ZEV Y AROSLA VSKY) Tj
/F7 7.36 Tf
0.00 -7.20 TD
(Third District) Tj
/F8 10.89 Tf
-396.24 -30.96 TD
(To:) Tj
/F7 7.25 Tf
396.72 16.08 TD
(DON KNABE) Tj
/F7 7.29 Tf
0.00 -7.20 TD
(Fourth District) Tj
/F8 11.09 Tf
-396.00 -84.96 TD
(From:) Tj
/F7 10.97 Tf
72.00 75.60 TD
(Supervisor Gloria Molina, Chair) Tj
/F7 10.94 Tf
0.00 -12.72 TD
(Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas) Tj
/F7 10.96 Tf
0.00 -12.72 TD
(Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky) Tj
/F7 10.92 Tf
0.00 -12.48 TD
(Supervisor Don Knabe) Tj
/F7 10.92 Tf
0.00 -12.72 TD
(Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich) Tj
/F9 12.00 Tf
-.24 -25.20 TD
(William T Fujioka . \\ Iv ri. ~) Tj
/F9 12.95 Tf
0.48 -12.48 TD
(Chief Executive Officer ~ r) Tj
/F8 7.34 Tf
323.76 83.04 TD
(MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH) Tj
/F8 7.39 Tf
0.00 -8.88 TD
(Fifth District) Tj
/F7 11.95 Tf
-396.00 -99.12 TD
(REPORT ON COUNTY'S USE OF E-VERIFY SYSTEM \(NOVEMBER 24, 2009 BOARD) Tj
/F8 11.40 Tf
-.72 -12.72 TD
(AGENDA, ITEM NO. 12\)) Tj
/F7 11.05 Tf
0.48 -25.44 TD
(On November 24, 2009, upon review of the October 26, 2009 E-Verify System Report prepared) Tj
/F8 13.02 Tf
0.00 -12.72 TD
(by the Chief Executive Office in coordination with County Counsel and Internal Services) Tj
/F7 11.27 Tf
0.24 -12.48 TD
(Department, on motion of Supervisor Molina, your Board directed the Chief Executive Officer,') Tj
/F7 11.45 Tf
-.72 -12.72 TD
(Acting Director of Personnel, and County Counsel to prepare a comprehensive review of the) Tj
/F7 10.99 Tf
0.48 -12.72 TD
(County's own E-Verify system, including how the process works and functions, and the potential) Tj
/F8 13.01 Tf
0.24 -12.48 TD
(liability from contractors, employees, or other entities for requiring County contractors to) Tj
/F7 10.89 Tf
0.00 -12.72 TD
(implement E-Verify.) Tj
/F7 11.25 Tf
-.48 -25.20 TD
(The attached report describes the County's experience in using the E-Verify system, operated) Tj
/F7 12.02 Tf
0.48 -12.72 TD
(by the Federal Department of Homeland Security and the United States Citizenship and) Tj
/F7 12.02 Tf
0.24 -12.48 TD
(Immigration Services. It should be noted that all pending court cases relating to E-Verify) Tj
/F7 11.22 Tf
-.48 -12.96 TD
(indicated in the October 26, 2009 report are still unresolved, and County Counsel will continue) Tj
/F7 11.63 Tf
-.24 -12.72 TD
(to monitor pending or future litigation, and report on any potential risk or liability issues with) Tj
/F8 10.79 Tf
0.48 -12.48 TD
(E-Verify.) Tj
/F7 11.19 Tf
0.24 -25.68 TD
(Please note that on February 2, 2010, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a decision in) Tj
/F7 11.74 Tf
-.24 -12.72 TD
(Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Edmonson \(formerly known as Chamber of) Tj
/F7 11.96 Tf
0.00 -12.72 TD
(Commerce of the United States v. Brad Henry\), which, among other things, reversed the) Tj
/F7 11.36 Tf
-.24 -12.48 TD
(temporary injunction against the State of Oklahoma from requiring government contractors to) Tj
/F7 11.74 Tf
0.48 -12.96 TD
(use the E-Verify system. However, a petition for rehearing of this case has been filed, and) Tj
/F7 11.75 Tf
0.00 -12.48 TD
(County Counsel advises that no conclusion should be drawn until this case, as well as the) Tj
/F7 11.14 Tf
0.24 -12.72 TD
(United States Supreme Court's decision on the judgment of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for) Tj
/F7 12.15 Tf
-.72 -12.72 TD
(the Arizona case, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Candelaria, are finally) Tj
/F8 12.01 Tf
0.48 -12.48 TD
(resolved.) Tj
/F7 9.95 Tf
111.60 -70.08 TD
("To Enrich Lives Through Effective And Caring Service") Tj
/F7 9.53 Tf
-22.32 -17.04 TD
(Please Conserve Paper - This Document and Copies are Two-Sided) Tj
/F7 9.68 Tf
28.32 -10.56 TD
(Intra-County Correspondence Sent Electronically Only) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC]/Font<>>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/Type/XObject/Subtype/Image/Name/Im6/Width 2550/BitsPerComponent 1/Length 60017/Height 3295/Decode[0 1]/ImageMask true/eCpyColor[0 0 0]/Filter/CCITTFaxDecode>>stream
dްՓb`&v[%A<@@14&ơU@.hA@
P,apg.^E@gAr@ʰ"h A>33#&3:
Өa ?Iaw'\"|h7!,T$201c7M es0* L)3*AK2S-
^Ȱm&UV6a0Uz!P_zV UdcU
,C
J0à| lhX¨a7 V!3M.}A4Ki?sA{
#W"O'mCiB3YhGQAW%lj4!B 39P " BB[ bco=aaRTr(KO{
Ma<t0Bd`.T?L=/_L tnA4ΠK 'J"ߦ4tp&ՇGz tD"OO8(!;:$w@J^H7+ @ ۠Db1 OT}< t>
PM")6&I鵧ޕ5]Jp@KIz'݂ `0\m_i=_MR7K_a"av*l*P۰.#8^z/_cIKm/K&x_p1m 6V4b_Gm}uX:V^P߉`m[ AI
=LNުxoSʃU__}$l^ձto@0t)?{Ywmfsm_
$t
n x B۶x7#rH6'8qa齥_UH?g` mW߿
imHwv`MKcI6iy_ȲnAzl%mҵKȁ3[M;:OlUu;_{DĭiMkWkuMTt|Б*"pŶm/om[^oނ6(/vnئJ~}[]{iᆂmAM10אji0үm{ITI/.#b8K74h|0Ka+a-#M%hPv]bAt?
l050IaV1T'Gg0a,0zwkaa
9"""90"$M[.(&0^;a&વU["OV6].A$#F_V:?hZji*A aDDT>"-lli %J,
x@}"JKM>GoZ$lF`0o$W`fD
A8"{@9}%I%pm7ѫI$I
a}o] JS$2jI AA0oح.zA /;}m$Sҹ7noZQߪH @m|' IBEqHحudA (3HF+iG?߿pUд",s1Lq*zL$(KZImQpK
#^9Ѳ!`P<w(u$60ݷ{qV{ӄkhq- j!fBDJH'oh?m,&i C|v{O&/ҐTlv:~)|ǯT`n߿kz!B#pſ
/?=I%Hf ~魜~yu WtoDhJC
A#VtoOX-'ohDR
Sf
#rrvwH}Wi]OhwKB
_֘&91e;'oAN_DGoJfq1o @KO߾i?]?UIWIoOJ Dy}Eeߪ&R|8_ ~ODD}!$ds@^PpD~FDz]no}